• 1st April 2009 - By Legendary Charisma

    to-meTime for lesson number two: To /me or not to /me during cyber. Typing “/me” at the start of a chat line in Second Life makes the colon disappear so you can make the line read “Legendary Charisma bakes a muffin” instead of “Legendary Charisma: bakes a muffin”. Such a small difference you say, why does it matter? So let’s start there – why does that tiny colon matter so much, and how can you deal with it to best advantage during cyber.

    To fully comprehend the strength of that colon you must remember that everyday chat in Second Life uses the colon as a short-hand for “says”. When you’re in Second Life everyday using it in that way, you take its meaning for granted and its absence when someone types in “/me” instead, is always (at least subconsciously) noticed. In fact it becomes very much second nature to use “/me” when you want to say what you think (“Legendary Charisma wonders if the dishes will wash themselves tonight”) or are doing (“Legendary Charisma does the dishes because they didn’t do themselves”) rather than what you are purely saying.

    So the question becomes whether you should use it in cyber, when you should use it, and why or why not.

    First off we have to begin with the issue of consistency. Consistency is very important in cyber because of reasons mentioned in my previous post – rhythm and staying in the mood; not being jolted out of your frame of mind, and focus on the task. So it is less than ideal to jump around in this way “Legendary Charisma cleans the plate. I think it’s clean now. Sparkly goodness”. It starts off in the third person narrative (“Legendary Charisma..”), then jumps to the first person (“I”). If you want to consistently use “I”, then avoid “/me” altogether (it’s not really that confusing, just read that sentence again). So instead it will read “Legendary Charisma: I’m cleaning the plate. I think it’s clean now. Sparkly goodness”.

    Straight away you see the problem: If the presence of the colon makes it appear to the seasoned Second Life mind as if you are “saying” the words that follow it, then it’s not very sexy or convincing to use the “I” in this way. The alternative is to always speak in the third person narrative and therefore continue through-out to use the “/me” function. For example: “Legendary Charisma wipes the dishes clean, then licks them clean. She is ever so happy with her night’s work”. See our new problem..? How damn weird is it to be talking about yourself in the third person in that way: “She”. It’s a bit unsettling, and again you’ll find people have trouble consistently using it – they naturally and instinctively want to jump back to “I” whenever it’s not the start of the chat line.

    You can solve this to some extent by always starting each line of cyber anew “Legendary Charisma eats dinner” “Legendary Charisma is annoyed cause now there’s a new plate to clean damnit”. Problem is your imagination is now limited since you always have to appear at the front of a sentence; it’s tight format is not conducive to the free flow of ideas. It also sounds kinda silly innit.

    So here’s where we are at: Either you’re mixing the first and third person voice, or you’re only using “I” and making yourself look like you’re talking, or you’re only using third person and making yourself look a bit wankery (though slightly less so if you avoid referring to yourself as “she” and just used the “/me” option).

    So this one is going to come down a lot to personal preference and comfort zone. I’m going to tell you what I think you should do. I think the best you can get by with is using the “/me” mixed with the “I”. Use “/me” at the start of the chat line when it suits what you’re trying to say – this way the flow is not jilted by the colon implying you’re saying the words: The Second Life mind will feel more comfortable reading actions and thoughts in this way. Then through-out the rest of the sentence/s on that chat line, use “I” / “my” as required. It is a heck of a lot better than using “she” to talk about yourself in cyber, because that third person referencing almost always sounds “removed” and unusual.

    Whatever you do though don’t jump around between using “she” and “I” within the text proper: “Legendary Charisma wipes the dish. Then I wonder why I’m even doing the dishes. Then she converts to takeaways so she never has to do them again”. That’s just icky and solidly in our no-no column.

    There is one last closely related piece of advice here that I strongly recommend: If you want yourself / your persona to actually talk during cyber, you need to make it very clear to your partner/s that you aren’t just continuing along the lines of action and thought of typical cyber. I recommend using speech marks to separate and emphasise when you are doing that. That way there is no confusion, none of that “oh I didn’t realise you were talking to me, that’s why I didn’t respond when you said your love for me is like the first suds on the first dish ever washed” or whatever. Most chat sessions will have some “verbal” component in this way and you need to know how to spot and to respond to them.

    Right, that’s lesson two done then, quick recap: Be aware of the “/me” function cause chances are your partner is. Be prepared to use it but make a conscious decision to use either “I’ or “she” through-out (not both) to avoid uncomfortable and disturbing inconsistencies. And try to make clear the difference between when your persona is thinking or doing something, and actually saying something – speech marks are good for this. There ya go, hope that helps :D

  • 4 Comments to “To /me or not to /me…”

    • Quaintly Tuqiri on April 5, 2009

      I thought I was the only one who would worry about things like being consistent about tenses and speaking in first or third person! I’m sure in the ‘heat of the moment’ most people don’t even notice things like that, but I do, lol.

      I’m used to /me and third person in SL but in off-world IM (MSN, Gtalk, Yahoo, etc) it just looks strange :P

    • Legendary Charisma on April 6, 2009

      Quaintly, there’s no doubt that a fair few people don’t notice these sorts of details (and thereby don’t care about them either), but cyber is an art-form like any other: You can treat it as something you can be very good at and improve to meet your own and others needs, or you can waft from experience to experience wondering why people never come back for more.

      The ones who do notice these details (like you and me) are going to be put off by others who don’t. And those who aren’t fully conscious of it might not be aware that it is what’s making them unable to fully relax and enjoy the experience – because it just “sounds wrong” or “feels weird”, and the hope is these posts will help those people see what’s going wrong (and how easy it is to fix once you’re aware of it) :)

    • valentina kendal on April 15, 2009

      I always notice those things and hope that partners who don’t might just pick up something from my example. Practice, practice, practice, I say. I find the use of third person during the heat of the moment to be very distracting, and the mixing of tenses to be doubly so. I treat the colon as an indication I am speaking, but use single quotes internally to show when I am speaking if it is a ‘mixed’ emote:

      :I brush the hair away from the curve of your neck, lean in close, and softly whisper ‘if that’s what you want…’

    • Legendary Charisma on April 15, 2009

      Always nice to meet someone else who is aware of and cares about such details. I wonder if there’s a difference between women and men being aware of the problem? Everyone I can remember talking to about this issue so far, that showed an awareness and interest in the matter, was female. Even if that’s true – that it’s more noticed by and relevant for women (and I’m not sure that it is) – then it should still be a matter of interest to the men who want to cyber those women. One hopes anyway!

    Leave a Reply


Switch to our mobile site